Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 27, 2011
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-25150
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
39-1804239 |
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
3333 West Good Hope Road, Milwaukee, WI 53209
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(414) 247-3333
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES
o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company þ |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock as of the
latest practicable date.
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share: 3,286,117 shares outstanding as of March 27, 2011
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
March 27, 2011
INDEX
PROSPECTIVE INFORMATION
A number of the matters and subject areas discussed in this Form 10-Q contain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking words or phrases such as anticipate,
believe, would, expect, intend, may, planned, potential, should, will, and
could, or the negative of these terms or words of similar meaning. These statements include
expected future financial results, product offerings, global expansion, liquidity needs, financing
ability, planned capital expenditures, managements or the Companys expectations and beliefs, and
similar matters discussed in this Form 10-Q. The discussions of such matters and subject areas are
qualified by the inherent risks and uncertainties surrounding future expectations generally, and
also may materially differ from the Companys actual future experience.
The Companys business, operations and financial performance are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties, which could result in material differences in actual results from the Companys
current expectations. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, general
economic conditions, in particular relating to the automotive industry, consumer demand for the
Companys and its customers products, competitive and technological developments, customer
purchasing actions, foreign currency fluctuations, costs of operations (including fluctuations in
the cost of raw materials) and other matters described under Risk Factors in the Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of this Form 10-Q
and in the section titled Risk Factors in the Companys Form 10-K report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended June 27, 2010.
Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors
carefully in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements made herein are only
made as of the date of this Form 10-Q and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update
such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances occurring after the
date of this Form 10-Q.
2
|
|
|
Item 1 |
|
Financial Statements |
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts; Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
March 28, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
March 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
65,650 |
|
|
$ |
52,883 |
|
|
$ |
186,711 |
|
|
$ |
146,604 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
56,531 |
|
|
|
44,022 |
|
|
|
157,466 |
|
|
|
123,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
9,119 |
|
|
|
8,861 |
|
|
|
29,245 |
|
|
|
23,312 |
|
Engineering, selling and administrative
expenses |
|
|
7,953 |
|
|
|
7,620 |
|
|
|
24,436 |
|
|
|
21,274 |
|
Recovery of bad debts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(421 |
) |
Impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
|
Environmental reserve adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
4,809 |
|
|
|
3,361 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Equity earnings of joint ventures |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
Interest expense related parties |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(171 |
) |
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
5,658 |
|
|
|
4,214 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
4,264 |
|
|
|
2,824 |
|
Net income attributed to non-controlling interest |
|
|
(687 |
) |
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
(1,544 |
) |
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to STRATTEC
SECURITY CORPORATION |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
781 |
|
|
$ |
2,720 |
|
|
$ |
2,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
742 |
|
|
$ |
1,049 |
|
|
$ |
4,264 |
|
|
$ |
2,824 |
|
Change in cumulative translation
adjustments, net |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
Pension Funded Status Adjustment,
net of tax of $192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
|
5,389 |
|
|
|
3,807 |
|
Comprehensive income attributed to
non-controlling interest |
|
|
(700 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
(1,566 |
) |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION |
|
$ |
637 |
|
|
$ |
1,158 |
|
|
$ |
3,823 |
|
|
$ |
3,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
3,286 |
|
|
|
3,273 |
|
|
|
3,284 |
|
|
|
3,270 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
3,339 |
|
|
|
3,284 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
3,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
3
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In Thousands, Except Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
12,680 |
|
|
$ |
21,867 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
42,528 |
|
|
|
36,084 |
|
Inventories- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished products |
|
|
5,930 |
|
|
|
3,653 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
4,260 |
|
Purchased materials |
|
|
12,311 |
|
|
|
9,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
|
23,431 |
|
|
|
17,086 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
14,290 |
|
|
|
12,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
92,929 |
|
|
|
90,008 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
10,534 |
|
|
|
10,534 |
|
Investment in joint ventures |
|
|
6,759 |
|
|
|
5,176 |
|
Loan to joint venture |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
137,933 |
|
|
|
136,728 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(99,618 |
) |
|
|
(99,677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
38,315 |
|
|
|
37,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
150,696 |
|
|
$ |
145,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
26,659 |
|
|
$ |
21,192 |
|
Loans from related parties |
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Accrued Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll and benefits |
|
|
14,598 |
|
|
|
15,496 |
|
Environmental reserve |
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
Warranty |
|
|
3,104 |
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,787 |
|
|
|
3,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
51,779 |
|
|
|
46,231 |
|
Accrued pension obligations |
|
|
17,605 |
|
|
|
18,492 |
|
Accrued postretirement obligations |
|
|
3,631 |
|
|
|
4,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, authorized 12,000,000 shares, $.01 par value, issued
6,917,957 shares at March 27, 2011 and 6,909,357 shares at June 27, 2010 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
79,825 |
|
|
|
79,339 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
161,440 |
|
|
|
162,706 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(30,838 |
) |
|
|
(31,941 |
) |
Less: treasury stock, at cost (3,631,840 shares at March 27,
2011 and 3,633,402 shares at June 27, 2010) |
|
|
(136,022 |
) |
|
|
(136,047 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION shareholders equity |
|
|
74,474 |
|
|
|
74,126 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
3,207 |
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
77,681 |
|
|
|
75,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
150,696 |
|
|
$ |
145,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated balance sheets.
4
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
March 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,264 |
|
|
$ |
2,824 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in)
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,904 |
|
|
|
5,335 |
|
Foreign currency transaction loss |
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
Stock based compensation expense |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
Equity earnings of joint ventures |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
(639 |
) |
Unrealized loss on foreign currency option contracts |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,258 |
|
Recovery of bad debts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(421 |
) |
Impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
|
Environmental reserve adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,125 |
) |
Loss on curtailment of employee benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
505 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(6,276 |
) |
|
|
(15,339 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(6,345 |
) |
|
|
(247 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(1,308 |
) |
|
|
(2,741 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
4,279 |
|
|
|
9,165 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
1,498 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in joint ventures |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
Purchase of additional interest in majority owned subsidiary |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
(2,100 |
) |
Loan to joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
Proceeds from repayment of loan to joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(5,727 |
) |
|
|
(4,945 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(3,928 |
) |
|
|
(8,635 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(3,989 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Repayment of loan from related parties |
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(4,795 |
) |
|
|
(192 |
) |
Foreign currency impact on cash |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(9,187 |
) |
|
|
(7,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
21,867 |
|
|
|
22,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
12,680 |
|
|
$ |
15,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
1,526 |
|
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
Interest paid related parties |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
5
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Basis of Financial Statements
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION designs, develops, manufactures
and markets automotive access
control products, including mechanical locks and keys, electronically enhanced locks and keys,
ignition lock housings, latches, power sliding door systems, power life gate systems, power deck
lid systems, door handles and other access control related products for North American automotive
customers. We also supply global automotive manufacturers through an alliance with WITTE Automotive of Velbert, Germany and ADAC Automotive of
Grand Rapids, Michigan, and a joint venture with these two companies
called Vehicle Access Systems Technology LLC (VAST LLC). Our products are shipped to customer locations in the United States,
Canada, Mexico, Europe, South America, Korea and China, and we provide full service and aftermarket
support.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the
consolidated results of STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION, its wholly owned Mexican subsidiary,
STRATTEC de Mexico, and its majority owned subsidiaries, ADAC-STRATTEC, LLC and STRATTEC POWER
ACCESS LLC. STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION is located in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. STRATTEC de Mexico
is located in Juarez, Mexico. ADAC-STRATTEC, LLC and STRATTEC POWER ACCESS LLC have operations in
El Paso, Texas and Juarez, Mexico. Equity investments in Vehicle Access Systems Technology LLC
(VAST LLC) for which we exercise significant influence but do not control and are not the primary
beneficiary, are accounted for using the equity method. VAST LLC consists primarily of two wholly
owned subsidiaries in China and one joint venture in Brazil. We have only one reporting segment.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet
as of June 27, 2010, which has been derived from our audited financial statements, and the related
unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting
only of normal recurring items, necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) and in accordance with
Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Interim financial results are not necessarily indicative of operating results for an
entire year. The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis and the financial statements and notes thereto included in the
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION 2010 Annual Report, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to our Form 10-K on September 1, 2010.
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued guidance
that requires reporting entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair value
measurements, including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value
measurements and information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in
the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements. The guidance is currently effective and the
required disclosures are included in our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under
Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
VAST LLC Purchase of Non-Controlling Interest of VAST China
Effective November 20, 2009, VAST LLC purchased the 40 percent non-controlling
interest in its two
Chinese joint ventures, VAST Fuzhou and VAST Great Shanghai, for $9.6 million. STRATTECs share of
the purchase price totaled $3.2 million. VAST LLC now owns 100 percent of VAST Fuzhou and VAST
Great Shanghai. Initially, a loan of $2.5 million was made from STRATTEC to VAST LLC related to
STRATTECs share of this transaction. The outstanding loan balance of $1.5 million as of March 27,
2011 is reflected as Loan to Joint Venture in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets included as
part of this report. A $2.1 million stand-by letter of credit was issued by VAST LLC, and
guaranteed by STRATTEC, related to the remaining amount due on this transaction. The final payment
related to this transaction was made on October 28, 2010 resulting in the cancellation of the
stand-by letter of credit, and the associated guarantee by STRATTEC. As a result of this purchase,
VAST LLC recorded a loss equal to the premium paid on the transaction of approximately $1.2 million
as a reduction of equity in its consolidated financial statements. STRATTECs share of this loss
totaled $409,000 and was recorded as a reduction of Capital in Excess of Par Value in the
accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
6
Derivative Instruments
We have manufacturing operations in Mexico. As a result, a portion of our manufacturing costs
are incurred in Mexican pesos, which causes our earnings and cash flows to fluctuate as a result of
changes in the U.S. dollar / Mexican peso exchange rate. Effective January 2011, we entered into
an agreement with Bank of Montreal that provides for two weekly Mexican peso currency option
contracts for a portion of our weekly estimated peso denominated operating costs through July 6,
2012. The weekly option contracts are for equivalent notional amounts. One provides for the
purchase of Mexican pesos at a U.S. dollar / Mexican peso exchange rate of 11.85 if the spot rate
at the weekly expiry date is below 11.85. The second provides for the purchase of Mexican pesos at
a U.S. dollar / Mexican peso exchange rate of 12.85 if the spot rate at the weekly expiry date is
above 12.85. Our objective in entering into these currency option contracts is to minimize our
earnings volatility resulting from changes in exchange rates affecting the U.S. dollar cost of our
Mexican operations. The Mexican peso option contracts are not used for speculative purposes and
are not designated as hedges, and as a result, all currency option contracts are recognized in our
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements at fair value and changes in the fair
value of the currency option contracts are reported in current earnings as part of Other (Expense)
Income, net. The total outstanding U.S. dollar notional amount of the option contracts as of March
27, 2011 totaled approximately $17.4 million. As of March 27, 2011, all amounts under the currency
option contacts expired unused due to the U.S. dollar / Mexican peso rate at the weekly expiry
dates being within the rage of 11.85 to 12.85. All purchases of Mexican pesos have been made at
the prevailing market rates and no realized gains or losses have been recognized under the currency
option contracts.
The fair market value of all outstanding peso option contracts in the accompanying Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets was as follows (thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
March 27, 2011 |
|
|
March 28, 2010 |
|
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexican Peso Option Contracts |
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
The pre-tax effects of the peso option contracts on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (Expense) Income, net |
|
|
|
March 27, 2011 |
|
|
March 28, 2010 |
|
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexican Peso Option Contracts Unrealized Gain |
|
$ |
320 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Mexican Peso Option Contracts Unrealized Loss |
|
|
(434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of our cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable
approximate book value as of March 27, 2011 and March 28, 2010. Fair value is defined as the
exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid for a liability in the principal or most
advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of March 27, 2011 (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Inputs |
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
Observable Inputs Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
In Active Markets |
|
|
Than Market Prices |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rabbi Trust assets |
|
$ |
4,297 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Mexican Peso Option Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Asset at Fair Value |
|
$ |
4,297 |
|
|
$ |
320 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexican Peso Option Contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
The Rabbi Trust assets fund our supplemental executive retirement plan and are included in
Other Current Assets in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Assets held in the
Trust include U.S. Treasury Securities and large, medium and small-cap stock index funds. The
Rabbi Trust assets are classified as Level 1 assets. Refer to the discussion of Mexican peso
option contracts under Derivative Instruments above. The fair value of the Mexican Peso option
contracts are based on an option pricing model that considers the remaining term, current exchange
rate and volatility of the underlying foreign currency base. There were no transfers between Level
1 and Level 2 assets during the nine months ended March 27, 2011.
Environmental Reserve
In 1995, we recorded a provision of $3 million for estimated costs to remediate a site at our
Milwaukee facility. The site was contaminated by a solvent spill, which occurred in 1985, from a
former above ground solvent storage tank located on the east side of the facility. The reserve was
originally established based on third party estimates to adequately cover the cost for active
remediation of the contamination. Due to changing technology and related costs associated with
active remediation of the contamination, an updated analysis and estimate was obtained during
fiscal 2009. As a result of this analysis, the reserve was reduced by approximately $1.1 million,
to $1.5 million at December 27, 2009, to reflect the revised monitoring and remediation cost
estimate. From 1995 through March 27, 2011, costs of approximately $400,000 have been incurred related to the
installation of monitoring wells on the property and ongoing monitoring costs. We continue to
monitor and evaluate the site with the use of groundwater monitoring wells that are installed on
the property. An environmental consultant samples these wells one or two times a year to determine
the status of the contamination and the potential for remediation of the contamination by natural
attenuation, the dissipation of the contamination over time to concentrations below applicable
standards. If such sampling evidences a sufficient degree of and trend toward natural attenuation
of the contamination, we may be able to obtain a closure letter from the regulatory authorities
resolving the issue without the need for active remediation. If a sufficient degree and trend
toward natural attenuation is not evidenced by sampling, a more active form of remediation beyond
natural attenuation may be required. The sampling has not yet satisfied all of the requirements
for closure by natural attenuation. As a result, sampling continues and the reserve remains at an
amount to reflect the estimated cost of active remediation. The reserve is not measured on a
discounted basis. We believe, based on findings-to-date and known environmental regulations, that
the environmental reserve of $1.5 million at March 27, 2011, is adequate.
Warranty
We have a warranty liability recorded related to our exposure to warranty claims in the event
our products fail to perform as expected, and we may be required to participate in the repair costs
incurred by our customers for such products. The recorded warranty liability balance involves
judgment and estimates. Our liability estimate is based on an analysis of historical warranty data
as well as current trends and information, including our customers recent extension of their
warranty programs. In March 2011, we increased our warranty liability by $1.1 million. The
increase is the result of estimated costs related to our share of the cost associated with a
customers specific warranty claim involving our product.
Shareholders Equity
A summary of activity impacting shareholders equity for the nine month period ended March 27,
2011 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Equity Attributed |
|
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
Attributed to |
|
|
to Non-Controlling |
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
STRATTEC |
|
|
Interest |
|
Balance, June 27, 2010 |
|
$ |
75,789 |
|
|
$ |
74,126 |
|
|
$ |
1,663 |
|
Net Income |
|
|
4,264 |
|
|
|
2,720 |
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
Dividend Declared |
|
|
(3,986 |
) |
|
|
(3,986 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of
Additional Interest in Majority Owned Subsidiary |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Translation adjustments |
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Stock Based Compensation |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Benefit Dividend Paid on
Restricted Shares |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchases |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 27, 2011 |
|
$ |
77,681 |
|
|
$ |
74,474 |
|
|
$ |
3,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
Other Income, net
Net other income included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Income accompanying this report primarily includes foreign currency transaction gains
and losses, unrealized losses on Mexican Peso option contracts, and Rabbi Trust gains and losses.
Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are the result of foreign currency transactions
entered into by our Mexican subsidiaries and fluctuations in foreign currency cash balances. The
Rabbi Trust funds our supplemental executive retirement plan. The investments held in the Trust
are considered trading securities. The impact of these items for each of the periods presented is
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
March 28, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
March 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Foreign Currency Transaction Loss |
|
$ |
(368 |
) |
|
$ |
(167 |
) |
|
$ |
(558 |
) |
|
$ |
(325 |
) |
Rabbi Trust Gain |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
Unrealized Loss on Mexican Peso |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Contracts |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(357 |
) |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
(101 |
) |
|
$ |
327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes
The income tax provisions for the three and nine month periods ended March 27, 2011 and March
28, 2010 are impacted by a lower effective tax rate for income subject to tax in Mexico as compared
to the effective tax rate for income subject to tax in the U.S. In addition, on December 17, 2010,
legislation was enacted that retroactively extended the U.S. research tax credit, which had expired
as of December 31, 2009. As a result of this extension, a tax benefit of $85,000 was recognized in
the quarter ended December 26, 2010.
Earnings Per Share (EPS)
Basic earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of
common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed on the basis of
the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus the potential dilutive common shares
outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Potential dilutive common shares
include outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards.
A reconciliation of the components of the basic and diluted per-share computations
follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 27, 2011 |
|
|
March 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
Attributable |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
|
to STRATTEC |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
to STRATTEC |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
Basic Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
|
3,286 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
781 |
|
|
|
3,273 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
|
3,339 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
781 |
|
|
|
3,284 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 27, 2011 |
|
|
March 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
Attributable |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
|
to STRATTEC |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
to STRATTEC |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
Basic Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
2,720 |
|
|
|
3,284 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
2,568 |
|
|
|
3,270 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
2,720 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
2,568 |
|
|
|
3,275 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings available to participating securities were not significant
for the three and nine months ended March 27, 2011 and March 28, 2010. We consider restricted stock
that provides the holder with a non-forfeitable right to receive dividends to be a participating
security.
9
As of March 27, 2011, options to purchase 90,000 shares of common stock at a
weighted-average exercise price of $56.29 were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings
per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. As of March 28, 2010, options to
purchase 219,650 shares of common stock at a weighted-average exercise price of $40.85 were
excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have been
anti-dilutive.
Stock-based Compensation
We maintain an omnibus stock incentive plan. This plan provides for the granting
of stock options, shares of restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. The Board of Directors
has designated 1,700,000 shares of common stock available for the grant of awards under the plan.
Remaining shares available to be granted under the plan as of March 27, 2011 were 227,443. Awards
that expire or are canceled without delivery of shares become available for re-issuance under the
plan. We issue new shares of common stock to satisfy stock option exercises.
Nonqualified and incentive stock options and shares of restricted stock have been granted to
our officers, outside directors and specified employees under our stock incentive plan. Stock
options granted under the plan may not be issued with an exercise price less than the fair market
value of the common stock on the date the option is granted. Stock options become exercisable as
determined at the date of grant by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The
options expire 5 to 10 years after the grant date unless an earlier expiration date is set at the
time of grant. The options vest 1 to 4 years after the date of grant. Shares of restricted stock
granted under the plan are subject to vesting criteria determined by the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors at the time the shares are granted and have a minimum vesting period of
three years from the date of grant. Restricted shares granted have voting and dividend rights,
regardless if the shares are vested or unvested. The restricted stock grants issued to date vest 3
years after the date of grant.
The fair value of each stock option grant was estimated as of the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes pricing model. The resulting compensation cost for fixed awards with graded vesting
schedules is amortized on a straight line basis over the vesting period for the entire award. The
fair value of each restricted stock grant was based on the market price of the underlying common
stock as of the date of grant. The resulting compensation cost is amortized on a straight line
basis over the vesting period.
A summary of stock option activity under the plan for the nine months ended March 27, 2011 is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Term (years) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Outstanding, June 27, 2010 |
|
|
297,650 |
|
|
$ |
33.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
22.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(36,550 |
) |
|
$ |
61.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, March 27, 2011 |
|
|
301,100 |
|
|
$ |
28.18 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
3,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, March 27, 2011 |
|
|
156,900 |
|
|
$ |
38.32 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
The intrinsic value of stock options exercised and the fair value of stock options vesting
during the three and nine month periods presented is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
March 28, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
March 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Intrinsic Value of Options Exercised |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fair Value of Stock Options Vesting |
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
293 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
10
The grant date fair value and assumptions used to determine compensation expense for the
options granted during the nine months ended March 27, 2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value: |
|
|
|
|
Options Issued at Grant Date Market Value |
|
|
n/a |
|
Options Issued Above Grant Date Market Value |
|
$ |
7.48 |
|
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
Risk Free Interest Rate |
|
|
1.08 |
% |
Expected Volatility |
|
|
59.89 |
% |
Expected Dividend Yield |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
Expected Term (in years) |
|
|
4.0 |
|
A summary of restricted stock activity under our omnibus stock incentive plan for
the nine months ended March 27, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested Balance, June 27, 2010 |
|
|
27,500 |
|
|
$ |
29.90 |
|
Granted |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
20.66 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(8,600 |
) |
|
$ |
47.78 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested Balance, March 27, 2011 |
|
|
38,900 |
|
|
$ |
21.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 27, 2011, there was $846,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
stock options granted under our omnibus stock incentive plan. This cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 1.2 years. As of March 27, 2011, there was
approximately $402,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock grants
under the plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.1
years. Total unrecognized compensation cost will be adjusted for any future changes in estimated
and actual forfeitures of awards granted under the plan.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
We have a qualified, noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all
U.S. associates. Benefits are based on years of service and final average compensation. Our policy
is to fund at least the minimum actuarially computed annual contribution required under the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Plan assets consist primarily of listed
equity and fixed income securities. Effective January 1, 2010, an amendment to the qualified
defined benefit pension plan discontinued the benefit accruals for salary increases and credited
service rendered after December 31, 2009. As a result of this action, a curtailment loss related
to unrecognized prior service cost of $505,000 was recorded during the second quarter of fiscal
2010.
We have a noncontributory supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP), which is a
nonqualified defined benefit plan. The SERP will pay supplemental pension benefits to certain key
employees upon retirement based upon the employees years of service and compensation. The SERP is
being funded through a Rabbi trust with M&I Trust Company. We also sponsor a postretirement health
care plan for all of our U.S. associates hired prior to June 2, 2001. The expected cost of retiree
health care benefits is recognized during the years that the associates who are covered under the
plan render service. Effective January 1, 2010, an amendment to the postretirement health care plan
limited the benefit for future eligible retirees to $4,000 per plan year and is subject to a
maximum coverage period based on the associates retirement date and age. The postretirement
health care plan is unfunded.
11
The following tables summarize the net periodic benefit cost recognized for each of the
periods indicated under these two plans (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
March 28, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
March 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(1,580 |
) |
|
|
(1,588 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized net loss |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
(152 |
) |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
March 28, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
March 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
3,453 |
|
|
|
3,808 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(4,742 |
) |
|
|
(4,763 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
(291 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized net loss |
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
614 |
|
|
$ |
1,130 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary contributions made to the qualified pension plan totaled $1.5 million during the
nine month period ending March 27, 2011. Voluntary contributions made to the qualified pension
plan totaled $3.0 million during the nine month period ending March 28, 2010. Additional voluntary
contributions of $500,000 are anticipated to be made during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011.
12
Item 2
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with STRATTEC
SECURITY CORPORATIONs accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto
and its 2010 Annual Report which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to our Form 10-K on September 1, 2010. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to years
refer to fiscal years.
Analysis of Results of Operations
Three months ended March 27, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 28, 2010
Net sales for the three months ended March 27, 2011 were $65.7 million compared to net sales
of $52.9 million for the three months ended March 28, 2010. Sales to our largest customers overall
increased in the current quarter compared to the prior year quarter levels primarily due to higher
customer vehicle production volumes. Higher value content on certain new products also contributed to
the net sales improvement. Sales to Chrysler Group LLC were $21.6 million in the current quarter
compared to $17.0 million in the prior year quarter. Sales to General Motors Company were $14.8
million in the current quarter compared to $13.5 million in the prior year quarter. Included in
the prior year sales to General Motors were $1.7 million of sales to Nexteer Automotive, which was
a unit of General Motors until November 30, 2010. Sales to Ford Motor Company increased to $7.0
million in the current quarter compared to $4.5 million in the prior year quarter. Sales to
Hyundai/Kia were $4.0 million in the current quarter compared to $2.8 million in the prior year
quarter. In the current quarter, net sales were reduced by $650,000 resulting from an adjustment
for customer price concessions. Also, in the prior year quarter historical customer pricing issues
were resolved which increased our net sales in that period by approximately $1.2 million.
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 13.9 percent in the current quarter compared to
16.8 percent in the prior year quarter. The lower gross profit margin in the current quarter was
primarily the result of a combination of the $650,000 adjustment for customer price concessions noted above and
$1.15 million in costs related to our share of the cost associated with a customers specific
warranty claim involving one of our products. Also impacting the current quarter were higher
purchased raw material costs for zinc and brass along with an unfavorable U.S. dollar exchange rate
affecting the U.S. dollar cost of our Mexican operations. The prior year quarter was also
unfavorably impacted by the recording of a $1.2 million warranty reserve. Historically, we had
experienced relatively low warranty charges from our customers due to our contractual arrangements
and improvements in the quality, reliability and durability of our products. More recently, our
largest customers extended their warranty protection for their vehicles and are also demanding
higher warranty cost sharing arrangements from suppliers. The prior year quarter warranty
provisions included additional accruals to address the warranty exposure related to the demand for
higher warranty cost sharing. The average zinc price paid per pound increased to $1.03 in the
current quarter from $0.94 in the prior year quarter. During the current quarter we used
approximately 2.5 million pounds of zinc. This resulted in increased zinc costs of approximately
$235,000 in the current quarter as compared to the prior year quarter. The average brass price
paid per pound increased to $4.09 in the current quarter from $3.40 in the prior year quarter.
During the current quarter we used approximately 228,000 pounds of brass. This resulted in
increased brass costs of approximately $158,000 in the current quarter as compared to the prior
year quarter. The average U.S. dollar/Mexican peso exchange rate decreased to approximately 12.17
pesos to the dollar in the current quarter from approximately 12.84 pesos to the dollar in the
prior year quarter. This resulted in increased U.S. dollar costs related to our Mexican operations
of approximately $435,000 in the current year quarter compared to the prior year quarter.
Engineering, selling and administrative expenses were relatively consistent between years and
totaled $8.0 million in the current quarter compared to $7.6 million in the prior year quarter.
The income from operations was $1.2 million in both the current year quarter and prior year
quarter. Due to the reduction in the gross profit margin discussed
above, we did not experience a benefit from the improvement in sales.
13
Net other expense was $357,000 in the current quarter compared to net other income of $16,000
in the prior year quarter. This change was primarily due to increased transaction losses resulting
from foreign currency transactions entered into by our Mexican subsidiaries in the current quarter
compared to the prior year quarter as well as an unrealized loss of $114,000 in the current quarter
on outstanding peso option contracts, which were entered into in January 2011 to minimize earnings
volatility resulting from changes in exchange rates affecting the U.S. dollar cost of our Mexican
operations. Foreign currency transaction losses totaled $368,000 in the current quarter compared
to $167,000 in the prior year quarter.
The income tax provision for each of the three month periods ended March 27, 2011
and March 28, 2011 was impacted by a lower effective tax rate for income subject to tax in Mexico
as compared to the effective tax rate for income subject to tax in the U.S.
Nine months ended March 27, 2011 compared to the nine months ended March 28, 2010
Net sales for the nine months ended March 27, 2011 were $186.7 million compared to net sales
of $146.6 million for the nine months ended March 28, 2010. Sales to our largest customers overall
increased in the current period compared to the prior year period levels due to higher customer
vehicle production volumes. Higher value content on certain new products also contributed to the net
sales improvement. Sales to Chrysler Group LLC were $58.8 million in the current period compared
to $46.3 million in the prior year period. Sales to General Motors Company were $46.1 million in
the current period compared to $35.8 million in the prior year period. Sales to Ford Motor Company
increased to $18.6 million in the current period compared to $13.4 million in the prior year
period. Sales to Hyundai/Kia were $11.8 million in the current period compared to $10.1 million in
the prior year period. In the current year period, net sales were reduced by $650,000 resulting
from an adjustment for customer price concessions. In the prior year period historical customer
pricing issues were resolved which increased our net sales during that period by approximately $1.2
million. The pricing issues related to a specific vehicle program and were fully resolved as of
the end of the prior year period.
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 15.7 percent in the current period
compared to 15.9 percent in the prior year period. The current year period impact to the gross
margin from favorable customer vehicle production volumes which resulted in more favorable
absorption of fixed manufacturing costs and reduced premium freight and overtime costs as compared
to the prior year period, were offset by a combination of the $650,000 adjustment for customer price
concessions noted above and $1.15 million in costs related to our share of costs associated with a customers
specific warranty claim involving one of our products. Also impacting the current quarter were
higher purchased raw material costs for zinc and brass along with an unfavorable Mexico Peso to
U.S. dollar exchange rate affecting the U.S. dollar cost of our Mexican operations and increased
expense provisions of approximately $414,000 for the accrual of bonuses under our Economic Value
Added (EVA®) Incentive Bonus Plans. The average brass price paid per pound increased to $3.86 in
the current period from $3.22 in the prior year period. During the current period, we used
approximately 748,000 pounds of brass. This resulted in increased brass costs of approximately
$480,000 in the current period compared to the prior year period. The average zinc price paid per
pound decreased to $1.00 in the current period from $1.04 in the prior year period. During the
current period, we used approximately 7.5 million pounds of zinc. This resulted in decreased zinc
costs of approximately $280,000 in the current period compared to the prior year period. The
average U.S. dollar/Mexican peso exchange rate decreased to approximately 12.45 pesos to the dollar
in the current year period from approximately 13.08 pesos to the dollar in the prior year period.
This resulted in increased U.S. dollar costs related to our Mexican operations of approximately
$1.2 million in the current year period compared to the prior year period.
The prior year period was negatively impacted by the recording of a $1.2 million
warranty reserve. Historically, we had experienced relatively low warranty charges from our
customers due to our contractual arrangements and improvements in the quality, reliability and
durability of our products. More recently, our largest customers extended their warranty
protection for their vehicles and are demanding higher warranty cost sharing arrangements from
suppliers. The prior year period warranty provisions included additional accruals to address the
warranty exposure related to the demand for higher warranty cost sharing. Also adversely affecting
our gross profit during the prior year period were increased premium freight costs and overtime
costs incurred during the months of September, October and November 2009 to meet significantly
increased production requirements from our largest customers as they continued to rebuild retail
inventories following the U.S. Governments Cash for Clunkers program that ended in August 2009.
The premium freight and overtime costs reduced the prior year period gross profit margin by
approximately 2 percentage points.
14
Also
impacting the prior year period gross profit margin was a curtailment
loss related to our
qualified defined benefit pension plan. An amendment to this plan, which was effective January 1,
2010, discontinued the benefit accruals for salary increases and credited service rendered after
December 31, 2009. A curtailment loss related to unrecognized prior service cost of $505,000 was
recorded in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive
Income, of which approximately $375,000 increased cost of goods sold and approximately $130,000
increased engineering, selling and administrative expenses.
Engineering, selling and administrative expenses were $24.4 million in the current period
compared to $21.3 million in the prior year period. The increase in operating expenses during the
current period was primarily attributed to higher spending for new product development and
increased incentive bonus expense provisions of approximately $300,000. Expenses in the prior year
period were lower due to temporary actions implemented with respect to the U.S. salaried work force
to help conserve cash during the recession. These actions included reductions in wages and the
Company 401(k) match, as well as cost savings related to several unpaid work furlough days.
Also, as discussed above, included in the prior year period costs was a curtailment loss of
$130,000.
An annual goodwill impairment analysis was completed during the quarter ended December 27,
2009 related to the goodwill recorded as part of the acquisition of
STRATTEC POWER ACCESS in November 2008. In the prior year period, a
$223,000 impairment charge to write off the goodwill balance was recorded as a result of this
analysis.
In 1995, we recorded a provision of $3 million for estimated costs to remediate a site at our
Milwaukee facility. The site was contaminated by a solvent spill, which occurred in 1985, from a
former above ground solvent storage tank located on the east side of the facility. The reserve was
originally established based on estimates to adequately cover the cost for active remediation of
the contamination. Due to changing technology and related costs associated with active remediation
of the contamination, an updated analysis and estimate was obtained during the quarter ended
December 27, 2009. In the prior year period, the reserve was reduced by approximately $1.1 million to reflect the revised
monitoring and remediation cost estimate.
The prior year period results included a $421,000 recovery of allowance for doubtful accounts.
In the quarter ended March 29, 2009, we recorded a $500,000 provision for doubtful accounts
in connection with Chrysler LLCs filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for certain of their
U.S. legal entities on April 30, 2009. As of September 27, 2009, all uncollectible amounts related
to the bankruptcy filings were written off against the reserve and the recovery of $220,000 was
recognized. In addition, as a result of payments received from Chrysler related to receivable
balances that were written off, $201,000 was recorded as a recovery of allowance for doubtful
accounts during the quarter ended December 27, 2009.
The income from operations in the current period was $4.8 million compared to $3.4 million in
the prior year period. This change was primarily the result of the increase in sales as discussed
above.
Equity earnings of joint ventures increased to $1.0 million during the current period compared
to $639,000 in the prior year period. This improvement was primarily the result of favorable
economic conditions in China and a year over year increase in our ownership percentage resulting
from the November 2009 purchase by VAST LLC of the non-controlling interest of its two Chinese
joint ventures, VAST Fuzhou and VAST Great Shanghai.
Net other expense was $101,000 in the current period compared to net other income of $327,000
in the prior year period. This change was primarily due to decreased Rabbi Trust gains in the
current period as compared to the prior year period, an increase in transaction losses resulting
from foreign currency transactions entered into by our Mexican subsidiaries in the current period
compared to the prior year period, and an unrealized loss of $114,000 in the current period on
outstanding peso option contracts, which were entered into in January 2011 to minimize our earnings
volatility resulting from changes in exchange rates affecting the U.S. dollar cost of our Mexican
operations. The Rabbi Trust funds our supplemental executive retirement plan. Gains related to
the Rabbi Trust totaled $343,000 in the current period compared to $454,000 in the prior year
period. The investments held in the Trust are considered trading securities. Foreign currency
transaction losses totaled $558,000 in the current period compared to $324,000 in the prior year
period.
15
The income tax provision (benefit) for the nine month periods ended March 27, 2011 and March
28, 2010 was impacted by a lower effective tax rate for income subject to tax in Mexico as compared
to the effective tax rate for income subject to tax in the U.S. In addition, on December 17, 2010,
legislation was enacted that retroactively extended the U.S. research tax credit, which had expired
as of December 31, 2009. As a result of this extension, a tax benefit of $85,000 was recognized in
the quarter ended December 26, 2010.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary source of cash flow is from our major customers, which include General Motors
Company, Ford Motor Company, and Chrysler Group LLC. As of the date of filing this Form 10-Q with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, all of our customers are making payments on their
outstanding accounts receivable in accordance with the payment terms included on their purchase
orders. A summary of our outstanding receivable balances from our major customers as of
March 27, 2010 is as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
General Motors |
|
$ |
10,413 |
|
Ford |
|
|
4,395 |
|
Chrysler |
|
|
14,361 |
|
Cash flow used in operating activities was $308,000 during the nine months ended
March 27, 2011 compared to cash flow provided by operating activities of $1.5 million during the
nine months ended March 28, 2010. Current period operating cash flow was impacted by an August
2010 payment of approximately $5 million in bonuses, which were earned during fiscal 2010 under our
incentive bonus plans. There were no bonus payments made in the prior year period. Pension
contributions totaled $1.5 million during the current year period compared to $3.0 million during
the prior year period. Current period operating cash flow was also impacted by an increase in
accounts receivable of $6.3 million, which resulted from increased sales during the current period
as compared to the prior year period.
Capital expenditures during the current year period totaled $5.7 million compared to $4.9
million in the prior year period. We anticipate that capital expenditures will be approximately $7
million in fiscal 2011, primarily relating to expenditures in support of requirements for new
product programs and the upgrade and replacement of existing equipment.
As a result of VAST LLCs purchase of the remaining non-controlling interest of its two
Chinese joint ventures in November 2009, a loan of $2.5 million was made from STRATTEC to VAST LLC
during the prior year period related to STRATTECs share of the purchase price due under this
transaction. A repayment of $1 million of the loan balance was received during the prior year
period. In addition, a $2.1 million stand-by letter of credit was issued by VAST LLC, and
guaranteed by STRATTEC, related to the remaining amount due on this transaction. This resulted in
$2.1 million of cash being restricted during the prior year period. The final payment related to
this transaction was made by VAST LLC on October 28, 2010 resulting in the cancellation of the
stand-by letter of credit, and the associated guarantee by STRATTEC. This resulted in the $2.1
million of previously restricted cash becoming available for operations during the current period.
On February 26, 2009, our Board of Directors took action to suspend payment of our quarterly
dividend to conserve cash. On August 4, 2010, our Board of Directors declared a special one-time
cash dividend of $1.20 per common share payable on October 29, 2010 to shareholders of record on
October 8, 2010. The special dividend totaled approximately $4.0 million and was funded with
current cash balances. Although we believe the outlook for our business is generally positive, the
uncertain strength of economic recovery in North America, and the effect that this and the recent
restructuring of our two largest customers may have on STRATTEC have resulted in both management
and our Board being cautious about reinstating a regular dividend at this time. However, our Board
intends to continue to review the situation on a regular basis in determining whether or not to
reinstate a regular dividend.
Our Board of Directors has authorized a stock repurchase program to buy back
outstanding shares of our common stock. Shares authorized for buy back under the program totaled
3,839,395 at March 27, 2011. A total of 3,655,322 shares have been repurchased as of March 27,
2011, at a cost of approximately $136.4 million. No shares were repurchased during the three or
nine months ended March 27, 2011. Additional repurchases may occur from time to time and are
expected to continue to be funded by cash flow from operations and current cash balances. Based on
the current economic environment and our preference to conserve cash for other uses, we anticipate
minimal or no stock repurchase activity for the remainder of fiscal year 2011.
16
We have a $20.0 million unsecured line of credit (the Line of Credit) with M&I Marshall &
Ilsley Bank, which expires October 30, 2011. There were no outstanding borrowings under the Line
of Credit at March 27, 2011 or March 28, 2010. Interest on borrowings under our line of credit is
at varying rates based on the London Interbank Offering Rate. We believe that the Line of Credit
is adequate, along with existing cash balances and cash flow from operations, to meet our
anticipated capital expenditure, working capital and operating expenditure requirements. The Line
of Credit is not subject to any covenants.
Over the past several years, we have been impacted by rising health care costs,
which have increased our cost of employee medical coverage. A portion of these increases have been
offset by plan design changes and employee wellness initiatives. We have also been impacted by
increases in the market price of zinc and brass and inflation in Mexico, which impacts the U. S.
dollar costs of our Mexican operations. We have negotiated raw material price adjustments clauses
with certain, but not all, of our customers to offset some of the market price fluctuations in the cost of zinc. Effective January 2011, we entered into
an agreement with Bank of Montreal that provides for two weekly Mexican peso currency option
contracts for a portion of our weekly estimated peso denominated operating costs through July 6,
2012. The weekly option contracts are for equivalent notional amounts. One provides for the
purchase of Mexican pesos at a U.S. dollar / Mexican peso exchange rate of 11.85 if the spot rate
at the weekly expiry date is below 11.85. The second provides for the purchase of Mexican pesos at
a U.S. dollar / Mexican peso exchange rate of 12.85 if the spot rate at the weekly expiry date is
above 12.85. Our objective in entering into these currency option contracts is to minimize our
earnings volatility resulting from changes in exchange rates affecting the U.S. dollar cost of our
Mexican operations. The Mexican peso option contracts are not used for speculative purposes and
are not designated as hedges, and as a result, all currency option contracts are recognized in our
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements at fair value and changes in the fair
value of the currency option contracts are reported in current earnings as part of Other (Expense)
Income, net. The total outstanding U.S. dollar notional amount of the option contracts as of March
27, 2011 totaled approximately $17.4 million. As of March 27, 2011, all amounts under the currency
option contacts expired unused due to the U.S. dollar / Mexican peso rate at the weekly expiry
dates being within the rage of 11.85 to 12.85. All purchases of Mexican pesos have been made at
the prevailing market rates and no realized gains or losses have been recognized under the currency
option contracts. As of March 27, 2011, the fair value of all outstanding option contracts
resulted in a net liability of $114,000, which has been recorded as an unrealized loss and is
included in Other (Expense) Income, net in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations and Comprehensive Income for the quarter ended March 27, 2011.
Joint Ventures
We participate in certain Alliance Agreements with WITTE Automotive (WITTE) and ADAC
Automotive (ADAC). WITTE, of Velbert, Germany, is a privately held automotive supplier. WITTE
designs, manufactures and markets components including locks and keys, hood latches, rear
compartment latches, seat back latches, door handles and specialty fasteners. WITTEs primary
market for these products has been Europe. ADAC, of Grand Rapids, Michigan, is a privately held
automotive supplier and manufactures engineered products, including door handles and other
automotive trim parts, utilizing plastic injection molding, automated painting and various assembly
processes.
The Alliance provides a set of cross-licensing agreements for the manufacture, distribution
and sale of WITTE products by STRATTEC and ADAC in North America, and the manufacture, distribution
and sale of STRATTEC and ADAC products by WITTE in Europe. Additionally, a joint venture company,
Vehicle Access Systems Technology LLC (VAST LLC), in which WITTE, STRATTEC and ADAC each hold a
one-third interest, exists to seek opportunities to manufacture and sell the companies products in
areas of the world outside of North America and Europe.
VAST do Brasil, a joint venture between VAST LLC and Ifer do Brasil Ltda., was formed to
service customers in South America. VAST Fuzhou and VAST Great Shanghai (collectively known as
VAST China), began as joint ventures between VAST LLC and Taiwanese partners to provide a base of
operations to service our automotive customers in the Asian market. Effective November 20, 2009,
VAST LLC purchased the remaining 40 percent interest of these two Chinese joint ventures, which was
held by our former Taiwanese partners, for $9.6 million. VAST LLC now owns 100 percent of the
Chinese joint ventures. VAST LLC also maintains branch offices in South Korea and Japan in support
of customer sales and engineering requirements.
17
The VAST LLC investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
The activities related to the VAST LLC joint ventures resulted in equity earnings of joint ventures
to STRATTEC of approximately $1.0 million during the nine months ended March 27, 2011 and
approximately $639,000 during the nine months ended March 28, 2010. During the nine months ended
March 27, 2011, capital contributions totaling $450,000 were made to VAST LLC in support of general
operating expenses. STRATTECs portion of the capital contributions totaled $150,000. During the
nine months ended March 28, 2010, capital contributions totaling $300,000 were made to VAST LLC in
support of general operating expenses. STRATTECs portion of the capital contributions totaled
$100,000.
In fiscal year 2007, we entered into a joint venture with ADAC forming ADAC-STRATTEC LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company. The joint venture was created to establish injection molding
and door handle assembly operations in Mexico. STRATTEC originally held a 50.1 percent interest in
ADAC-STRATTEC LLC. Effective June 28, 2010, STRATTEC purchased an additional .9 percent interest
from ADAC and now owns 51 percent. A Mexican entity, ADAC-STRATTEC de Mexico, exists
and is wholly owned by ADAC-STRATTEC LLC. ADAC-STRATTEC LLCs financial results are consolidated
with the financial results of STRATTEC and resulted in increased net income to STRATTEC of
approximately $497,000 during the nine months ended March 27, 2011 and approximately $70,000 during
the nine months ended March 28, 2010.
Effective November 30, 2008, STRATTEC established a new entity, STRATTEC POWER ACCESS LLC
(SPA), which is 80 percent owned by STRATTEC and 20 percent owned by WITTE. SPA operates the
North American portion of the Power Products business which was acquired from Delphi Corporation.
The financial results of SPA are consolidated with the financial results of STRATTEC and resulted
in increased net income to STRATTEC of approximately $1.8 million during the nine months ended
March 27, 2011 and $157,000 during the nine months ended March 28, 2010.
Other Matters
Health care reform legislation was recently enacted by the Federal government. We are
currently evaluating the legislation to determine its effects on our plan structure, future
operating results and financial position.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued guidance
that requires reporting entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair value
measurements, including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value
measurements and information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in
the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements. The guidance is currently effective and the
required disclosures are included in our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under
Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company believes the following represents its critical accounting policies:
Pension and Postretirement Health Benefits Pension and postretirement health
obligations and costs are developed from actuarial valuations. The determination of the obligation
and expense for pension and postretirement health benefits is dependent on the selection of certain
assumptions used by actuaries in calculating such amounts. Those assumptions are described in the
Notes to Financial Statements in our 2010 Annual Report and include, among others, the discount
rate, expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, retirement age and rates of increase in
compensation and health care costs. We evaluate and update all of the assumptions annually on June
30, the measurement date. Actual results that differ from these assumptions are deferred and,
under certain circumstances, amortized over future periods. While we believe that the assumptions
used are appropriate, significant differences in the actual experience or significant changes in
the assumptions may materially affect our pension and postretirement health obligations and future
expense related to these obligations. Refer to the discussion of Critical Accounting Policies
included in the Managements Discussion and Analysis and Retirement Plans and Postretirement Costs
included in the Notes to Financial Statements in our 2010 Annual Report filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to our Form 10-K on September 1, 2010.
18
Other Reserves We have reserves such as an environmental reserve, a warranty reserve, an
incurred but not reported claim reserve for self-insured health plans, a workers compensation
reserve, an allowance for doubtful accounts related to trade accounts receivable and a repair and
maintenance supply parts reserve. These reserves require the use of estimates and judgment with
regard to risk exposure, ultimate liability and net realizable value.
Environmental Reserve We have a liability recorded related to the estimated costs to
remediate a site at our Milwaukee facility, which was contaminated by a solvent spill from a former
above ground solvent storage tank occurring in 1985. The recorded environmental liability balance
involves judgment and estimates. Our reserve estimate is based on a third party assessment of the
costs to adequately cover the cost of active remediation of the contamination at this site. Actual
costs might vary from this estimate for a variety of reasons including changes in laws and changes
in the assessment of the level of remediation actually required at this site. Therefore, future
changes in laws or the assessment of the level of remediation required could result in changes in
our estimate of the required liability. Refer to the discussion of Commitments and Contingencies
included in the Notes to Financial Statements in our 2010 Annual Report filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to our Form 10-K on September 1, 2010.
Warranty Reserve We have a warranty liability recorded related to our exposure to warranty
claims in the event our products fail to perform as expected, and we may be required to participate
in the repair costs incurred by our customers for such products. The recorded warranty liability
balance involves judgment and estimates. Our liability estimate is based on an analysis of
historical warranty data as well as current trends and information, including our customers recent
extension of their warranty programs. Actual warranty costs might vary from estimates due to the
level of actual claims varying from our claims experience and estimates. Therefore, future actual
claims experience could result in changes in our estimates of the required liability. Refer to the
discussion of Warranty in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this
Form 10-Q and to the discussion of Warranty Reserve under Organization and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies included in the Notes to Financial Statements in our 2010 Annual Report filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to our Form 10-K on September 1, 2010.
Incurred But Not Reported Claim Reserve for Self-Insured Health Plans and Workers
Compensation Reserve We have self-insured medical and dental plans covering all eligible U.S.
associates. We also maintain an insured workers compensation program covering all U.S.
associates. The insurance is renewed annually and may be covered under a loss sensitive plan.
Under a loss sensitive plan, the ultimate cost is dependent upon losses incurred during the policy
period. The incurred loss amount for loss sensitive policies will continue to change as claims
develop and are settled in future periods. The expected ultimate cost of claims incurred under
these plans is subject to judgment and estimation. We estimate the ultimate expected cost of
claims incurred under these plans based upon the aggregate liability for reported claims and an
estimated additional liability for claims incurred but not reported. Our estimate of claims
incurred but not reported is based on an analysis of historical data, current trends related to
claims and health care costs and information available from the insurance carrier. Actual ultimate
costs may vary from estimates due to variations in actual claims experience from past trends and
large unexpected claims being filed. Therefore, changes in claims experience and large unexpected
claims could result in changes to our estimate of the claims incurred but not reported liabilities.
Refer to the discussion of Self Insurance and Loss Sensitive Plans under Organization and Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies included in Notes to Financial Statements in our 2010 Annual
Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to our Form 10-K on
September 1, 2010.
19
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Related to Trade Accounts Receivable Our trade accounts
receivable consist primarily of receivables due from Original Equipment Manufacturers in the
automotive industry and locksmith distributors relating to our service and aftermarket business.
Our evaluation of the collectibility of our trade accounts receivable involves judgment and
estimates and includes a review of past due items, general economic conditions and the economic
climate of the industry as a whole. The estimate of the required reserve involves uncertainty as
to future collectibility of receivable balances. This uncertainty is magnified by the financial
difficulty currently experienced by our customers as discussed under Risk-Factors-Loss of
Significant Customers, Vehicle Content, Vehicle Models and Market Share included in the
Managements Discussion and Analysis in our 2010 Annual Report filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to our Form 10-K on September 1, 2010. Also, refer to the
discussion of Receivables under Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
included in Notes to Financial Statements in our 2010 Annual Report filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to our Form 10-K on September 1, 2010.
Repair and Maintenance Supply Parts Reserve We maintain an inventory of repair and
maintenance parts in support of operations. The inventory includes critical repair parts for all
production equipment as well as general maintenance items. The inventory of critical repair parts
is required to avoid disruptions in our customers just-in-time production schedules due to lack of
spare parts when equipment break-downs occur. Depending on maintenance requirements during the
life of the equipment, excess quantities of repair parts arise. A repair and maintenance supply
parts reserve is maintained to recognize the normal adjustment of inventory for obsolete and
slow-moving repair and maintenance supply parts. Our evaluation of the reserve level involves
judgment and estimates, which are based on a review of historical obsolescence and current
inventory levels. Actual obsolescence may differ from estimates due to actual maintenance
requirements differing from historical levels. This could result in changes to our estimated
required reserve. Refer to the discussion of Repair and Maintenance Supply Parts under
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in the Notes to Financial
Statements in our 2010 Annual Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to our Form 10-K on September 1, 2010.
We believe the reserves discussed above are estimated using consistent and appropriate
methods. However, changes to the assumptions could materially affect the recorded reserves.
Stock-Based Compensation Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based
on the value of the award and is recognized as expense over the vesting period. Determining the
fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating future
volatility of our stock, the amount of stock-based awards that are expected to be forfeited and the
expected term of awards granted. We estimate the fair value of stock options granted using the
Black-Scholes option valuation model. We amortize the fair value of all awards on a straight-line
basis over the vesting periods. The expected term of awards granted represents the period of time
they are expected to be outstanding. We determine the expected term based on historical experience
with similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms and vesting schedules. We
estimate the expected volatility of our common stock at the date of grant based on the historical
volatility of our common stock. The volatility factor used in the Black-Scholes option valuation
model is based on our historical stock prices over the most recent period commensurate with the
estimated expected term of the award. We base the risk-free interest rate used in the
Black-Scholes option valuation model on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury
zero-coupon issues with a remaining term commensurate with the expected term of the award. We use
historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures. We record stock-based compensation
only for those awards that are expected to vest. If actual results differ significantly from these
estimates, stock-based compensation expense and our results of operations could be materially
impacted.
20
Risk Factors
We recognize we are subject to the following risk factors based on our operations
and the nature of the automotive industry in which we operate:
Loss of Significant Customers, Vehicle Content, Vehicle Models and Market Share Sales to
General Motors Company, Ford Motor Company and Chrysler Group LLC represented approximately 67
percent of our annual net sales (based on fiscal 2010 results) and, accordingly, these customers
account for a significant percentage of our outstanding accounts receivable. The contracts with
these customers provide for supplying the customers requirements for a particular model. The
contracts do not specify a specific quantity of parts. The contracts typically cover the life of a
model, which averages approximately four to five years. Components for certain customer models may
also be market tested annually. Therefore, the loss of any one of these customers, the loss of a
contract for a specific vehicle model, reduction in vehicle content, early cancellation of a
specific vehicle model, technological changes or a significant reduction in demand for certain key
models could occur, and if so, could have a material adverse effect on our existing and future
revenues and net income.
On April 27, 2009, General Motors announced certain aspects of its Revised Viability Plan
including reduced production volumes for calendar year 2009 and the subsequent five years. The
announcement indicated that certain vehicle brands, including Pontiac, Saturn, Hummer and Saab,
will be discontinued or sold. In addition, subsequent to Chrysler LLCs filing for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection on April, 30 2009, they announced certain vehicle models planned for
discontinuation (Jeep Commander, Jeep Compass, Jeep Patriot, Dodge Nitro, Dodge Avenger, Dodge
Caliber, Dodge Durango, Dodge Dakota, Dodge Viper, Chrysler Sebring, Chrysler Aspen etc.).
Subsequently, certain of the models have been reaffirmed for continued production over the next two
years. We continue to evaluate the impact these evolving plans have on our business as more
details become available.
Our major customers also have significant under-funded legacy liabilities related to pension
and postretirement health care obligations. The future impact of these items along with a
continuing loss in their North American automotive market share to the New Domestic automotive
manufacturers (primarily the Japanese automotive manufacturers) and/or a significant decline in the
overall market demand for new vehicles may ultimately result in severe financial difficulty for
these customers, including bankruptcy. If our major customers cannot fund their operations, we may
incur significant write-offs of accounts receivable, incur impairment charges or require additional
restructuring actions. For example, on October 8, 2005, Delphi Corporation filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection. As a result, we wrote-off $1.6 million of uncollectible accounts receivable
due from Delphi Corporation. This directly reduced our pre-tax net income during fiscal 2006. On
April 30, 2009, Chrysler LLC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for certain of their U.S.
legal entities. During fiscal 2009, we recorded a provision for bad debts of $500,000 related to
this filing, of which we subsequently recovered $421,000 of the $500,000 provision during fiscal
2010. This directly reduced our pre-tax net income during 2009 by $500,000 and increased our
pre-tax income during 2010 by $421,000.
Production Slowdowns by Customers Our major customers and many of their suppliers have
been significantly impacted by the recession of 2008/2009. Many of our major customers instituted
production cuts during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010. Moreover, certain of our major customers have
announced plans to continue these production cuts into future fiscal years. For example, during
April 2009, General Motors Corporation announced assembly plant downtime for the months of May
through July in order to reduce excess inventories at their dealer locations. Consequently, this
downtime reduced our production schedules and affected both our sales and profitability for our
fiscal fourth quarter ending June 28, 2009 and our fiscal 2010 first quarter ending September 27,
2009. Additionally, on April 27, 2009, General Motors announced some aspects of its Revised
Viability Plan including reduced production volumes for the remainder of calendar 2009 and the
subsequent five calendar years. The continuation of these production cuts could have a material
adverse effect on our existing and future revenues and net income.
Financial Distress of Automotive Supply Base Automotive industry conditions have adversely
affected STRATTEC and our supply base. Lower production levels at our major customers, volatility
in certain raw material and energy costs and the global credit market crisis resulted in severe
financial distress among many companies within the automotive supply base. During calendar years
2009 and 2010, several automotive suppliers have filed for bankruptcy protection or ceased
operations. The continuation of financial distress within the supply base and suppliers inability
to obtain credit from lending institutions may lead to commercial disputes and possible supply
chain interruptions. In addition, the adverse industry environment may require us to take measures
to ensure uninterrupted production. The continuation or worsening of these industry conditions
could have a material adverse effect on our existing and future revenues and net income.
21
Shortage of Raw Materials or Components Supply In the event of a rapid increase in
production demands, either we or our customers or other suppliers may experience supply shortages
of raw materials or components. This could be caused by a number of factors, including a lack of
production line capacity or manpower or working capital constraints. In order to manage and reduce
the costs of purchased goods and services, we and others within our industry have been
rationalizing and consolidating our supply base. In addition, due to the recent turbulence in the
automotive industry, several suppliers have filed for bankruptcy proceedings or ceased operations.
As a result, there is greater dependence on fewer sources of supply for certain components and
materials, which could increase the possibility of a supply shortage of any particular component.
If any of our customers experience a material supply shortage, either directly or as a result of
supply shortages at another supplier, that customer may halt or limit the purchase of our products.
Similarly, if we or one of our own suppliers experience a supply shortage we may become unable to
produce the affected products if we cannot procure the components from another source. Such
production interruptions could impede a ramp-up in vehicle production and could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We consider the production capacities and financial condition of suppliers in our selection
process, and expect that they will meet our delivery requirements. However, there can be no
assurance that strong demand, capacity limitations, shortages of raw materials or other problems
will not result in any shortages or delays in the supply of components to us.
Cost Reduction There is continuing pressure from our major customers to reduce the prices
we charge for our products. This requires us to generate cost reductions, including reductions in
the cost of components purchased from outside suppliers. If we are unable to generate sufficient
production cost savings in the future to offset pre-programmed price reductions, our gross margin
and profitability will be adversely affected.
Cyclicality and Seasonality in the Automotive Market The automotive market is cyclical and
is dependent on consumer spending, on the availability of consumer credit and, to a certain extent,
on customer sales incentives. Economic factors adversely affecting consumer demand for automobiles
and automotive production, such as rising fuel costs, could adversely impact our net sales and net
income. We typically experience decreased sales and operating income during the first fiscal
quarter of each year due to the impact of scheduled customer plant shut-downs in July and new model
changeovers.
Foreign Operations As discussed under Joint Ventures, we have joint venture investments
in Mexico, Brazil and China. As these operations continue to expand, their success will depend, in
part, on our and our partners ability to anticipate and effectively manage certain risks inherent
in international operations including: enforcing agreements and collecting receivables through
certain foreign legal systems, payment cycles of foreign customers, compliance with foreign tax
laws, general economic and political conditions in these countries and compliance with foreign laws
and regulations.
Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations Our sales are denominated in U.S. dollars.
We have manufacturing operations in Mexico, and as a result, a portion of our manufacturing costs
are incurred in Mexican pesos. Therefore, fluctuations in the U.S. dollar / Mexican peso exchange
rate may have a material effect on our profitability, cash flows and financial position, and may
significantly affect the comparability of our results between financial periods. Any depreciation
in the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to the value of the Mexican peso will adversely affect
the cost of our Mexican operations when translated into U.S. dollars. Similarly, any appreciation
in the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to the value of the Mexican peso will decrease the cost
of our Mexican operations when translated into U.S. dollars. As described in Derivative
Instruments in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q,
we have entered into weekly peso currency option contracts to minimize the volatility resulting from changes in
the exchange rates. There can be no assurances that the peso currency option contracts will eliminate our
exchange rate risk associated with our Mexican operations.
22
Sources of and Fluctuations in Market Prices of Raw Materials Our primary raw materials are
high-grade zinc, brass, nickel silver, aluminum, steel and plastic resins. These materials are
generally available from a number of suppliers, but we have chosen to concentrate our sourcing with
one primary vendor for each commodity or purchased component. We believe our sources of raw
materials are reliable and adequate for our needs. However, the development of future sourcing
issues related to using existing or alternative raw materials and the global availability of these
materials as well as significant fluctuations in the market prices of these materials may have an
adverse affect on our financial results if the increased raw material costs cannot be recovered
from our customers.
Given the significant financial impact on us relating to changes in the cost of our primary
raw materials, commencing with fiscal 2008, we began quoting quarterly material price adjustments
for changes in our raw material costs in our negotiations with our customers. Our success in
obtaining these quarterly price adjustments in our customer contracts is dependent on separate
negotiations with each customer. It is not a standard practice for our customers to include such
price adjustments in their contracts. We have been successful in obtaining quarterly price
adjustments in some of our customer contracts. However, we have not been successful in obtaining
the adjustments with all of our customers.
Disruptions Due to Work Stoppages and Other Labor Matters Our major customers and many of
their suppliers have unionized work forces. Work stoppages or slow-downs experienced by our
customers or their suppliers could result in slow-downs or closures of assembly plants where our
products are included in assembled vehicles. For example, strikes by a critical supplier called by
the United Auto Workers led to extended shut-downs of most of General Motors North American
assembly plants in February 2008 and in 1998. A material work stoppage experienced by one or more
of our customers could have an adverse effect on our business and our financial results. In
addition, all production associates at our Milwaukee facility are unionized. A sixteen-day strike
by these associates in June 2001 resulted in increased costs as all salaried associates worked with
additional outside resources to produce the components necessary to meet customer requirements.
The current contract with the unionized associates is effective through June 29, 2014. We may
encounter further labor disruption after the expiration date of this contract and may also
encounter unionization efforts in our other plants or other types of labor conflicts, any of which
could have an adverse effect on our business and our financial results.
Current labor contracts between General Motors Company, Ford Motor Company
and Chryster Group LLC and their unionized associates under the
United Auto Workers expire on September 14, 2011. Labor disruptions
encountered after the expiration date of these contracts could have
an adverse effect on our business and our financial results.
Environmental and Safety Regulations We are subject to Federal, state, local and foreign
laws and other legal requirements related to the generation, storage, transport, treatment and
disposal of materials as a result of our manufacturing and assembly operations. These laws include
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (as amended), the Clean Air Act (as amended) and the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (as amended). We have an
environmental management system that is ISO-14001 certified. We believe that our existing
environmental management system is adequate for current and anticipated operations and we have no
current plans for substantial capital expenditures in the environmental area. An environmental
reserve was established in 1995 for estimated costs to remediate a site at our Milwaukee facility.
The site was contaminated by a former above-ground solvent storage tank, located on the east side
of the facility. The contamination occurred in 1985. This is being monitored in accordance with
Federal, state and local requirements. We do not currently anticipate any material adverse impact
on our results of operations, financial condition or competitive position as a result of compliance
with Federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws or other legal requirements. However,
risk of environmental liability and changes associated with maintaining compliance with
environmental laws is inherent in the nature of our business and there is no assurance that
material liabilities or changes could not arise.
Highly Competitive Automotive Supply Industry The automotive component supply industry is
highly competitive. Some of our competitors are companies, or divisions or subsidiaries of
companies, that are larger than STRATTEC and have greater financial and technology capabilities.
Our products may not be able to compete successfully with the products of these other companies,
which could result in loss of customers and, as a result, decreased sales and profitability. Some
of our major customers have also announced that they will be reducing their supply base. This
could potentially result in the loss of these customers and consolidation within the supply base.
The loss of any of our major customers could have a material adverse effect on our existing and
future net sales and net income.
23
In addition, our competitive position in the North American automotive component supply
industry could be adversely affected in the event that we are unsuccessful in making strategic
acquisitions, alliances or establishing joint ventures that would enable us to expand globally. We
principally compete for new business at the beginning of the development of new models and upon the
redesign of existing models by our major customers. New model development generally begins two to
five years prior to the marketing of such new models to the public. The failure to obtain new
business on new models or to retain or increase business on redesigned existing models could
adversely affect our business and financial results. In addition, as a result of relatively long
lead times for many of our components, it may be difficult in the short-term for us to obtain new
sales to replace any unexpected decline in the sale of existing products. Finally, we may incur
significant product development expense in preparing to meet anticipated customer requirements
which may not be recovered.
Program Volume and Pricing Fluctuations We incur costs and make capital expenditures for
new program awards based upon certain estimates of production volumes over the anticipated program
life for certain vehicles. While we attempt to establish the price of our products for variances
in production volumes, if the actual production of certain vehicle models is significantly less
than planned, our net sales and net income may be adversely affected. We cannot predict our
customers demands for the products we supply either in the aggregate or for particular reporting
periods.
Investments in Customer Program Specific Assets We make investments in machinery and
equipment used exclusively to manufacture products for specific customer programs. This machinery
and equipment is capitalized and depreciated over the expected useful life of each respective
asset. Therefore, the loss of any one of our major customers, the loss of specific vehicle models
or the early cancellation of a vehicle model could result in impairment in the value of these
assets and may have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
Financial Industry / Credit Market Risk The U.S. capital and credit markets experienced significant volatility
and disruption during the 2008/2009 recession. In many cases this resulted in
pressures on borrowers and reduced credit availability from certain issuers without regard to the
underlying financial strength of the borrower or issuer. If financial market
disruption and volatility occur again in the future, there can be no assurance that such conditions will
not have an effect on our ability to access debt and, in turn, result in a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Warranty Claims We are exposed to warranty claims in the event that our products fail to
perform as expected, and we may be required to participate in the repair costs incurred by our
customers for such products. Our largest customers have recently extended their warranty
protection for their vehicles. Other OEMs have similarly extended their warranty programs. We are
engaged with ongoing discussions with our customers regarding certain warranty claims. This trend
will put additional pressure on the supply base to improve quality systems. This trend may also
result in higher cost recovery claims by OEMs from suppliers whose products incur a higher rate of
warranty claims. Historically, we have experienced relatively low warranty charges from our
customers due to our commercial arrangements and improvements in the quality, reliability and
durability of our products. If our customers demand higher warranty-related cost recoveries, or if
our products fail to perform as expected, it could have a material adverse impact on our results of
operations and financial condition.
24
|
|
|
Item 3 |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Our exposure to market risk is limited to fluctuations in raw material commodity prices and
foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with STRATTECs foreign operations. We do not
utilize financial instruments for trading purposes. We have not had outstanding borrowings with
third parties since December 1997. There is, therefore, currently no significant exposure to
market risk for changes in interest rates. To the extent that we incur future borrowings under our
line of credit, we would be subject to interest rate risk related to such borrowings. We are
subject to foreign currency exchange rate exposure related to the U.S. dollar costs of our
manufacturing operations in Mexico. A portion of our manufacturing costs are incurred in Mexican
pesos. Our earnings and cash flows are subject to fluctuations as a result of changes in the U.S.
dollar / Mexican peso exchange rate. Effective January 2011, we entered into an agreements with
Bank of Montreal that provides for two weekly Mexican peso currency option contracts for a portion
of our weekly estimated peso denominated operating costs through July 6, 2012. The weekly option
contracts are for equivalent notional amounts. One provides for the purchase of Mexican pesos at a
U.S. dollar / Mexican peso exchange rate of 11.85 if the spot rate at the weekly expiry date is
below 11.85. The second provides for the purchase of Mexican pesos at a U.S. dollar / Mexican peso
exchange rate of 12.85 if the spot rate at the weekly expiry date is above 12.85. Our objective in
entering into these currency option contracts is to minimize our earnings volatility resulting from
changes in exchange rates affecting the U.S. dollar cost of our Mexican operations. The Mexican
peso option contracts are not used for speculative purposes and are not designated as hedges, and as
a result, all currency option contracts are recognized in our accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements at fair value and changes in the fair value of the currency option contracts
are reported in current earnings as part of Other (Expense) Income, net. The total outstanding U.S.
dollar notional amount of the option contracts as of March 27, 2011 totaled approximately $17.4
million. As of March 27, 2011, all amounts under the currency option contacts expired unused
due to the U.S. dollar / Mexican peso rate at the weekly expiry dates being within the range of
11.85 to 12.85. All purchases of Mexican pesos have been made at the prevailing market rates and
no realized gains or losses have been recognized under the currency option contracts. As of March
27, 2011, the fair value of all outstanding option contracts resulted in a net liability of
$114,000, which has been recorded as an unrealized loss and is included in Other (Expense) Income,
net in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income for
the quarter ended March 27, 2011. Moreover, a material increase in the cost of certain of our raw
material components, such as zinc or brass, would increase our cost of goods sold and, therefore,
could materially adversely affect our profitability.
|
|
|
Item 4 |
|
Controls and Procedures |
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Companys reports filed or submitted under
the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the Security and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and that the information required to be
disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated
and communicated to its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of the end of
the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based
on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of
the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at reaching a level
of reasonable assurance. It should be noted that in designing and evaluating the disclosure
controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control
objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost
benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. We have designed our disclosure controls
and procedures to reach a level of reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control
objectives.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our most recently completed fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
25
Part II
Other Information
In the normal course of business, we may be involved in various legal proceedings from time to
time. We do not believe we are currently involved in any claim or action the ultimate disposition
of which would have a material adverse effect on our financial statements.
Please refer to the section titled Risk Factors herein for disclosures regarding the risks
and uncertainties relating to our business. There have been no material changes to the risk
factors disclosed in our Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 1, 2010.
|
|
|
Item 2 |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program on October 16, 1996,
and the program was publicly announced on October 17, 1996. The Board of Directors has
periodically increased the number of shares authorized for repurchase under the program, most
recently in August 2008. The program currently authorizes the repurchase of up to 3,839,395 shares
of our common stock from time to time, directly or through brokers or agents, and has no expiration
date. Over the life of the repurchase program through March 27, 2011, a total of 3,655,322 shares
have been repurchased at a cost of approximately $136.4 million. No shares were repurchased during
the quarter or nine month period ended March 27, 2011.
|
|
|
Item 3 |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities None |
|
|
|
Item 4 |
|
[Removed and Reserved] |
|
|
|
Item 5 |
|
Other Information None |
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification for Harold M. Stratton II, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification for Patrick J. Hansen, Chief Financial Officer |
|
32(1) |
|
|
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certifications |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This certification is not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
26
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION (Registrant)
|
|
|
|
Date: May 6, 2011 |
By /s/ Patrick J. Hansen
|
|
|
Patrick J. Hansen |
|
|
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |
|
|
27
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Harold M. Stratton II, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 6, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Harold M. Stratton II
|
|
|
Harold M. Stratton II, |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Patrick J. Hansen, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 6, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick J. Hansen
|
|
|
Patrick J. Hansen, |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Exhibit 32
Exhibit 32
Certification of Periodic Financial Report
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION (the Company)
certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 27,
2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 6, 2011 |
/s/ Harold M. Stratton II
|
|
|
Harold M. Stratton II, |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 6, 2011 |
/s/ Patrick J. Hansen
|
|
|
Patrick J. Hansen, |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the
knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.